ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
DCCE-UNet: a difference and context-aware contrast enhanced framework for ultrasound image segmentation.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate segmentation of lesion regions in ultrasound images (US) is critical for computer-aided diagnosis and clinical decision-making. However, the inherent challenges of US imaging—including blurred lesion boundaries, low tissue contrast, and irregular morphological variations—significantly hinder the reliability and generalizability of existing segmentation methods.
methodsTo overcome these limitations, we propose Difference and Context-aware Contrast Enhanced UNet (DCCE-UNet), a novel structure-aware and context-enhanced segmentation framework that extends the U-Net backbone with three specialized modules: (1) the multi-source attention-guided semantic generation block, which improves multi-scale semantic extraction by adaptively aggregating complementary feature cues, (2) the bidirectional difference-aware attention module, which enhances boundary modeling by capturing directional feature differences, and (3) the context-aware guidance module, which integrates spatial contextual dependencies to refine feature representations. These components work in synergy to improve structural perception and spatial discrimination in US image segmentation.
resultsExtensive experiments were conducted on two publicly available breast ultrasound datasets, BUSI and TN3K. The proposed DCCE-UNet consistently outperformed state-of-the-art models across key evaluation metrics, achieving a Dice coefficient of 79.85% and an IoU of 66.46% on BUSI, and reaching 89.29% Dice and 88.83% IoU on TN3K. Ablation studies further confirmed the effectiveness and complementary of each module in improving segmentation accuracy and boundary integrity, particularly in challenging cases involving small lesions, heterogeneous textures, and ambiguous contours.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate that DCCE-UNet provides a robust and generalizable solution for automated ultrasound image segmentation. The proposed framework exhibits strong potential for real-world clinical deployment, with implications for improving diagnostic efficiency, reducing manual workload, and enabling reliable lesion analysis in ultrasound imaging workflows. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.