ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
The association between residential segregation and stillbirths in Brazil-a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSegregation is the degree to which two or more groups live separately. While US research has linked segregation to increased stillbirth risk, studies from Latin America have yet to explore this. This study investigated the association between the racial and income segregation index (SI) and stillbirth prevalence in Brazil.
methodsWe used nationwide birth data from Brazil in 2018 (live births from Live Birth Information System, SINASC, and stillbirths from Mortality Information System, SIM). Income and racial SI were calculated using the 2010 national census and analyzed as quintiles with the least segregated group as the reference. Odds ratios were calculated using a logistic regression model, adjusting for infant sex, maternal age, education, previous fetal loss, and the municipal level percentage of the population earning less than half the minimum wage. The sub-analysis was stratified by city size, area-level stillbirth prevalence, and stillbirth type (intrapartum or antepartum).
resultsTwo million seven hundred seventy-one thousand two hundred seventy-two live-born and stillborn in 2018 were included in the analysis. Women in municipalities with high income and racial SI were older, had more education, and had more previous fetal loss. Women in municipalities with the highest income SI had a 25.1% higher risk of delivering a stillbirth (95% CI: 1.202-1.303). Those in the highest racial SI municipalities had a 5.5% lower risk of delivering a stillbirth compared to those in the quintile with the lowest racial SI (95% CI: 0.908-0.984). In regions with low stillbirth prevalence, a dose-response relationship was observed between income segregation and stillbirth, with the risk of stillbirth among those with the highest income SI being more than twice that of the least segregated (OR 2.086, 95% CI: 1.494-2.911). In larger cities, racial and income segregation were associated with reduced odds of stillbirth. The effect of income SI was larger for intrapartum stillbirths.
conclusionsWe observed that income segregation increases the odds of stillbirth, especially in municipalities with low stillbirth prevalence, while the association for racial segregation was less consistent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.