Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188735›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Developing an evidence base to inform retirement home policy development using an equity and diversity lens: a mixed methods study protocol.

K Kehoe MacLeod, V Wicks, S R Isenberg, C Backman, I Beogo, J M Cénat, S Fisher, S Johnston, C E Kendall, D R Manis and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

K Kehoe MacLeodBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada. kmacleod@bruyere.org.
V WicksBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada.
S R IsenbergBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada.
C BackmanBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada.
I BeogoFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
J M CénatSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
S FisherOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
S JohnstonDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
C E KendallBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada.
D R ManisBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada.
M MurayFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
M NorrisDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
W LiOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
K PatelBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada.
A ShiamptanisRetirement Homes Regulatory Authority, Toronto, Canada.
K SpencerPerley Health, Ottawa, Canada.
P TugwellBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada.
P YurtAdvantAge Ontario, Vaughan, Canada.
C WebberBruyère Health Research Institute, 85 Primrose Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1R7G5, Canada.

Funding

CIHR PJT 191698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetirement homes are an essential support for many older adults as they age. However, retirement homes may not be an option for all, particularly adults with low socioeconomic status or those from linguistic or visible minority groups, in jurisdictions where there are high out-of-pocket costs and limited availability of language- and culturally-concordant home options. Research examining health inequities in facility-based care for older adults has largely focused on the long-term care sector leaving a gap in knowledge and understanding about the care experiences and health outcomes of retirement home residents. The overall aim of this project is to build an evidence base and provide policy recommendations to improve equity in the retirement home sector in Ontario, Canada.

methodsWe will conduct a multi-phase sequential mixed methods study involving both quantitative and qualitative data. Phase 1 will involve consulting on social and systemic barriers to equity in RHs with our Community Advisory Committee members and advocacy group collaborators. In phase 2, we will lead retrospective cohort studies using Ontario health administrative data to describe and evaluate differences in rates of RH vs. LTC use and differences in healthcare outcomes. In Phase 3, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with older adults and their family partners preparing to enter or having already entered, facility-based care within the prior 6 months to investigate how individuals' social identity, including language and income, and pragmatic considerations shape decision-making regarding the transition to facility-based care, including choices between retirement homes and long-term care. Findings from Phases 1,2 and 3 will be contextualized in Phase 4 with decision-maker knowledge users, such as from the Retirement Home Regulatory Authority and Ontario Ministries of Health, Long-term Care, and Seniors and Accessibility. DISCUSSION: This project will leverage the existing momentum for long-term care reform where evidence of health inequities is well documented, to engage in research in a neighbouring sector that serves older adults with increasingly similar health profiles and complexities. We will disseminate contextualized policy options to both provincial-level decision-makers and community knowledge user partners to help inform future work on equity in retirement homes at different levels of governance.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHomes for the AgedPolicy MakingRetirementAgedHumansOntarioRetrospective StudiesDiversityEquityMixed methodsOntarioPolicyRetirement home

Identifiers

PMID41188735
PMCPMC12584279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.