ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Treatment limitations and participation in elderly patients - the gap between medical-ethical guidelines and clinical practice: a cross sectional-study from Sweden.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Special ethical aspects in older intensive care patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDecision-making regarding treatment limitations such as "Do not attempt resuscitation" (DNAR) orders for older patients has been found deficient. Patients ≥ 80 years with substantial comorbidity have little chance of surviving cardiac arrest, thus require thorough risk classification focusing on comorbidity and frailty. This study aimed to explore the degree of frailty, comorbidity and treatment limitations in patients ≥ 80 years in various forms of care. Additionally, the study examined the extent to which patients and/or relatives participated in these decisions.
methodsDescriptive, quantitative cross-sectional design. Medical records of 500 patients ≥ 80 years were reviewed: 100 medical, 100 orthopaedic and 100 surgical in-patients, in addition to 100 patients in Home Health Services (HHS) and 100 patients in Municipal Short-Term Care (MSTC). Comorbidity was classified and categorized using the Age-combined Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI). Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). DNAR decisions as well as other treatment and care limitations were compiled. Patients' and relatives' participation in discussions and information about treatment limitations was also examined.
resultsOf the 500 patients, 48% had a moderate (5-7 points) and 50% a severe burden (≥ 8 points) of ACCI, while 91% were rated as frail (CFS ≥ 5). In total, 176/500 (35%) had valid DNAR-decisions. Both age ≥ 90 years (OR 4.07, 95% CI 2.56-6.37) and CFS ≥ 5 (OR 16.13, 95% CI 4.54-103.40) was significantly associated with a DNAR-decision, while ACCI ≥ 8 was not. Less than a third (29%) of patients with a DNAR-decision had been informed by a physician. For those without a DNAR-decision, there was no documentation of discussions regarding their wish for full cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of cardiac arrest. Of all 500 patients, 14% had a discussion with a physician about CPR.
conclusionFewer treatment limitations than expected were documented for older, frail patients with moderate or severe comorbidity. Considerable deficiencies were found regarding decision-making and actively reviewing and confirming DNAR-decisions, showing a gap between medical-ethical guidelines and their application in practice. Improved adherence to medical-ethical guidelines would strengthen patients' legal rights and their opportunity for shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.