Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188699›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Collectors, not hoarders: Complex gene structures in Amphidinium carterae revealed through nanopore sequencing.

M Judd, A Baldino, J Wira, A R Place, Tsvetan Bachvaroff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M JuddUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Baltimore, MD, USA.
A BaldinoUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J WiraUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Baltimore, MD, USA.
A R PlaceUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tsvetan BachvaroffUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Baltimore, MD, USA. bachvarofft@umces.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDinoflagellates are ecologically vital marine microalgae with notoriously large and complex genomes, marked by extensive repetition and unconventional gene structures. Here, we present a near-complete genome assembly for Amphidinium carterae, assembled exclusively using Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing and comprehensively annotated using a transcriptome-guided approach.

resultsThe 1.25 Gb nuclear genome spans 2,478 contigs with a coverage of 60X, N50 of 1.1 Mb, and contains 55% repetitive elements. Annotation was challenging due to the prevalence of short exons, long introns, tandem gene duplication, and frequent nesting of genes. Standard BUSCO analysis using AUGUSTUS underestimated completeness; however, super-transcriptome-guided correction revealed over 89.6% of conserved genes, underscoring the importance of tailored annotation approaches for dinoflagellates. For the 68 densely packed tandemly repeated gene sets, with copy numbers ranging from 3 to 52, identification and annotation required a combination of methods including manual curation. Comparison to a recent independent assembly of an alternate A. carterae strain corroborated the results with slight variation in gene copy and nucleotide sequence but overall showed strong conservation of tandem gene sets. Many tandem repeat gene regions displayed high conservation across both coding and non-coding segments, implying DNA-based duplication. Gene expression analyses revealed that tandem gene arrays contributed significantly to transcriptional output, with expression levels positively correlated with copy number (p = 1.7e-15), suggesting a dose-dependent regulatory mechanism. The most highly duplicated gene, Major Basic Nuclear Protein (MBNP), was also one of the most highly expressed gene families and existed in distinct long and short isoforms arranged in alternating tandem patterns.

conclusionsThis genome represents a comprehensive assembly with exhaustive annotation of tandem gene sets within a free-living dinoflagellate genome and offers new insights into gene organization, expression regulation, and repeat-driven genome architecture. Our findings challenge the long-held view of dinoflagellates as genomic “hoarders”, instead revealing a strategy of selective gene retention, curation, and amplification related to selection pressures. This work provides a valuable reference for future genomic studies and paves the way for improved annotation of complex, repeat-rich eukaryotic genomes.

Indexed as

DinoflagellidaGenome, ProtozoanNanopore SequencingGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationTandem Repeat SequencesTranscriptomeDinoflagellateGene annotationGenomeTandem genes

Identifiers

PMID41188699
PMCPMC12584245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.