ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Adherence to guidelines for preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients in a tertiary teaching hospital.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tackling Biofilm-Forming Pathogens: A Challenge to Overcome in the Fight Against Infectious Diseases.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimUrinary catheterization contributes significantly to hospital-acquired infections. Adhering to CDC guidelines is vital to prevent inappropriate use and reduce infection rates. This study evaluated compliance with these guidelines in hospitalized patients at a tertiary hospital in 2024. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study assessed compliance with CDC guidelines for preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in hospitalized patients at Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan. Data were gathered through patient observation and chart reviews, evaluating demographics, catheter indications, retention duration, and guideline adherence. Department-specific compliance rates were also analyzed. Standardized checklists ensured consistent data recording.
resultsOf 1262 patients evaluated, 477 (37.8%) underwent urinary catheterization, with a 57.3% adherence rate to CDC guidelines. The most common appropriate indication was acute urinary retention (15.4%), followed by urine output monitoring in critically ill patients (14.5%) and intraoperative monitoring (11.1%). Adherence was highest in cardiology and urology, while gynecology, rheumatology, plastic surgery, and vascular surgery had the lowest rates. The emergency department showed only 27.8% adherence.
conclusionThe findings highlight a suboptimal adherence rate to CDC guidelines in urinary catheterization, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to improve compliance. Strategic interventions can enhance adherence and subsequently reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.