ArticleMycopathologia2025
Standardization and Clinical Evaluation of a Real-Time PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PjP) is a life-threatening infection in immunocompromised individuals. Its diagnosis remains challenging, especially in microscopy-negative cases. This study aimed to standardize and validate a qPCR assay targeting the mtLSU rRNA gene for detecting P. jirovecii DNA in respiratory samples from patients in Argentina. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe assay was optimized using plasmid dilutions containing the target gene. Analytical specificity was evaluated against 60 fungal, 21 mycobacterial, and 16 bacterial species. Clinical validation included 101 respiratory samples from symptomatic patients and 37 from healthy individuals. An internal positive control (IPC) was included in all reactions to detect inhibitors.
resultsThe qPCR assay showed a detection limit of 8.8 copies/μL and no cross-reactivity. Among microscopy-confirmed cases, 95.5% were qPCR-positive. Notably, 14.9% of microscopy-negative but clinically compatible cases tested positive. ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.96, with an optimal Ct cutoff ≤ 36, providing 90.7% sensitivity and 95.8% specificity. No healthy controls tested positive. A "grey zone" (Ct 36-37.8) was observed, requiring clinical correlation.
conclusionsThis qPCR assay is highly sensitive and specific, offering a valuable diagnostic tool for PjP. Its performance supports implementation in routine diagnostics, especially when microscopy is inconclusive. However, interpretation in the grey zone requires complementary clinical or biomarker data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41188654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.