Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188629›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Precise bonebridge implantation in challenging cases: a novel approach using virtual planning and electromagnetic navigation.

Nils Kristian Prenzler, Susan Busch, Niels Rudnik, Thomas Lenarz, Daniel Schurzig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nils Kristian PrenzlerDept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. prenzler.nils@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3721-5585
Susan BuschDept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Niels RudnikDept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas LenarzDept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Daniel SchurzigDept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe second generation of the Bonebridge (BB) bone conduction implant was shown to be a viable option even for younger children with conductive or mixed hearing loss. However, preoperative imaging often shows only small areas where the FMT (4.5 mm) or screws (4.0 mm) can be fully and safely inserted without the need to use lifts. Navigation systems allow precise placement of the device and prevent potential complications such as dural or vascular injuries. The latest version of the preoperative planning software Otoplan® allows to assess bone thickness and perform virtual implantation. MATERIALS &

methodsSix children between 3 and 12 years of age underwent BB implantation using Otoplan® with export of the planned BB position to a navigation system. Prior to an intraoperative cone beam CT (CBCT), 3 marker screws were placed in the temporal bone. Images were loaded into Otoplan® to virtually define the optimal BB position and export the corresponding model. CBCT scan and model were then loaded into an electromagnetic navigation system. The screws were used to accurately register the system, and the planned BB placement was projected onto the patient. BB implantation was performed accordingly and finally the marker screws were removed. Possible complications were monitored and the audiological success was measured using an age-appropriate speech test.

resultsBone thickness at the screw location was over 4.0 mm in every case, documenting the accuracy of the procedure. No medical complications occurred intraoperatively, during the immediate hospital stay, or up to and including the initial fitting 4-6 weeks after implantation. Speech test results were greater than or equal to 90% in all measurable patients.

conclusionVirtual implantation with Otoplan® can be loaded into a navigation system to mark the safe position of the screws on the temporal bone. Projecting the planned position onto the patient using navigation is a practical tool that can make implantation more reliable and safer for patients.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, ConductiveProsthesis ImplantationSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical Navigation SystemsTemporal BoneBone ConductionBone ScrewsChildChild, PreschoolCone-Beam Computed TomographyElectromagnetic PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleBone-anchored hearing aidsBone conductionBone thicknessImplant fixationNavigated surgerySafety

Identifiers

PMID41188629
PMCPMC13002632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.