Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188525›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Projectile deformation on human bone and on a polyurethane simulant.

W Kerkhoff, E J A T Mattijssen, R R van Rijn, N H J Lobe, F Riva, R J Oostra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

W KerkhoffDepartment of Chemical and Physical Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute, the Hague, the Netherlands. w.kerkhoff@nfi.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-3264
E J A T MattijssenDepartment of Chemical and Physical Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute, the Hague, the Netherlands.
R R van RijnDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Netherlands Forensic Institute, the Hague, the Netherlands.
N H J LobeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
F RivaCentre Universitaire Romand de Medicine Legale Lausanne-Geneva, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
R J OostraDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyurethane bone simulants are often used in ballistic experiments, within a forensic and medico-legal context and elsewhere. This study compared the degree of deformation of projectiles fired at human bone to projectiles fired at a polyurethane bone simulant. Ductile 5.5 mm spheres were propelled with a mean velocity of 279 m/s and fired at both freshly embalmed human cranial bone samples and at polyurethane bone simulant samples. The spheres deformed more when perforating the human samples than when perforating the polyurethane samples. As a result, it is questionable to use such simulants for medico-legal and forensic studies where aspects such as bullet deformation and bullet path reconstruction are important. The degree of deformation did not seem to be influenced by overall cranial bone thickness, nor by the overall thickness of the polyurethane simulant. With human bone, a positive relation is observed between projectile deformation and thickness of the tabula externa.

Indexed as

Forensic BallisticsPolyurethanesSkullWounds, GunshotHumansPolyurethanesBone simulantCalvariaCraniumHuman bonePolyurethaneSkullSynbone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.