ArticleScientific reports2025
Hybrid MLOps framework for automated lifecycle management of adaptive phishing detection models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent data governance and quality control for chest Bi syndrome/coronary heart disease across the prevention-treatment-rehabilitation continuum: integrating a standardized framework, adversarially-optimized trigger engine, and domain-adaptive AI.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- Drift isn't a bug, it's the work: post-deployment surveillance for clinical artificial intelligence.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phishing detection models degrade quickly due to drift, adversarial evasion, and fairness issues. Existing MLOps platforms mainly automate deployment and monitoring. Prior works have examined SHAP-based monitoring, retraining, or fairness audits separately, but lack an integrated theory of resilience for adversarial environments. We introduce the Hybrid MLOps Framework (HAMF), a system designed to embed resilience and ethical governance into the lifecycle of phishing detection models. HAMF is 'hybrid' because it unifies proactive and reactive adaptation, combining automation with stakeholder oversight, and embedding resilience with ethical governance. HAMF treats resilience as an integrated lifecycle property, designed to simultaneously preserve model accuracy, fairness, and stakeholder trust amidst concept drift. Methodologically, HAMF implements this through a hybrid control cycle. This cycle fuses four key capabilities: SHAP-guided feature replacement, event-driven retraining, fairness-triggered audits, and structured human feedback. Unlike conventional pipelines where these functions are isolated, HAMF ensures their interdependence as first-class triggers. Empirical evaluations on large-scale phishing streams demonstrate HAMF's superior performance. The framework detects drift within 18 seconds, restores F1 scores above 0.99 post-attack, reduces subgroup disparities by over 60%, and scales to over 2,300 requests per second with sub-50ms latency. These results validate HAMF's design, demonstrating that embedding resilience and ethical alignment into the MLOps lifecycle is both effective and scalable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.