ArticleScientific reports2025
24-hour movement behaviours are cross-sectionally associated with cognitive function in healthy adults aged 55 years and older.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microstructural Brain Reserve Moderates the Associations Between 24-h Movement Behaviors and Cognition in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Findings From the AGUEDA Trial.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
- Longitudinal associations between 24-hour movement behaviours and cognitive function in adults aged 55 and above.Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors · 2026Article
- Association of 24-hour movement guideline adherence with inhibitory control in older adults: the mediating role of general self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The Relation of Alpha Asymmetry to Physical Activity Duration and Intensity.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global life expectancy has consistently increased since 1950, resulting in more people living to an older age. However, maintaining optimal cognitive health is a challenge as ageing is accompanied by natural cognitive decline, which can affect daily functioning and quality of life. Importantly, modifiable lifestyle factors can play a role in promoting healthy ageing. Among these, physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and sleep have gained increasing attention for their potential contributions to cognitive health. This study investigates in greater detail how these 24-hour movement behaviours relate to cognitive function in older adults. Participants were 233 healthy adults aged 55 years and older (51.1% women; mean age 68.3 ± 7.7 years). Daily time spent in light PA (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), SB and sleep was derived from 7-day wrist-worn ActiGraphy (wGT3X-BT). Cognitive function, including short-term and long-term memory (STM, LTM), executive function (EF) and processing speed, was assessed using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and expressed in z-scores. Compositional multiple linear regression was used to assess the association between time use and cognitive function. Compositional isotemporal substitution examined how hypothetical time reallocations between the different movement behaviours were related to cognitive function. Even after adjusting for age, sex, educational level, social isolation and multiple testing, time use was significantly associated with short-term memory (p = 0.01) and executive function (p = 0.001). Hypothetical time reallocations of 30-min from LPA to MVPA were associated with the largest significant mean differences of 0.19 [95% confidence interval 0.05-0.32] in STM z-scores and 0.21 [0.10-0.33] in EF z-scores. Notably, reallocating time from LPA or sleep to SB was also related to better EF z-scores. Importantly, reallocating even 5 minutes away from MVPA to any other behaviour was significantly associated with poorer z-scores in STM and EF. No significant associations were observed for long-term memory and processing speed. This study underscores the importance of considering 24-hour movement behaviours in cognitive health at older age. Dedicating time to moderate-to-vigorous PA seems to be important for specific cognitive domains. Longitudinal studies are needed to further explore these relationships, with a focus on detailed assessments of the various contexts in which PA and SB occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.