ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of the CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adsorption mechanisms of methylene blue and methyl orange on activated carbon: scientific interpretation and modeling simulation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Statistical Mechanics-Driven Adhesion of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) and Carbofuran for Water Disinfection.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Synthesis and Characterization of Rubisco-Magnesium Complexes for Potential Gas Adsorption Applications.ACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising concentration of atmospheric CO₂ is a major driver of climate change, necessitating the development of efficient carbon capture technologies. This study quantitatively investigates the surface buildup and multilayer adsorption behavior of CO₂ on activated carbon (AC) using a probabilistic modeling framework in conjunction with adsorption experiments. Key parameters analyzed include the number of adsorption layers, adhesion energy (ΔEa), internal energy (Eint), and void density (DM). Results reveal that CO₂ adsorption on AC forms three to four distinct layers under optimal pressure and temperature conditions, with elevated temperatures reducing the number of layers due to increased interaction energy. The process is characterized as exothermic physisorption (ΔEa: 23.08–23.78 kJ/mol) with no evidence of chemical bonding. Multilayer adsorption effectively compensates for AC’s high density of active sites, thereby enhancing CO₂ capture efficiency. These insights advance the understanding of CO₂ sorption mechanisms on heterogeneous surfaces and guide the design of more thermally stable and efficient carbon capture materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.