ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Patient expectations and concerns regarding robotic thyroidectomy in china: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality assessment of public education short videos on robot-assisted cholecystectomy and analysis of audience preferences.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Not all patients need a robot: comparative perioperative outcomes of robotic BABA versus endoscopic CABBA thyroid lobectomy with ipsilateral central lymph node dissection, stratified by body mass index.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Adverse events and device malfunctions in robotic thyroidectomy: a decade-long analysis of the MAUDE database.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Engagement-quality mismatch in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty short videos on TikTok and Bilibili.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic thyroidectomy (RT) has gained increasing patient interest and clinical adoption in China. However, patient perceptions of RT remain poorly understood. A cross-sectional survey of 211 patients who had previously heard of RT was conducted to explore their attitudes, expectations and concerns regarding the procedure. Of the participants, 158 (74.9%) were female, with a median age of 36. The primary source of RT-related information was hospital or clinic visits (58.8%), followed by the Internet and social media (42.7%). Over half (53.6%) showed a clear preference for RT, while 24.2% remained undecided and 22.3% did not favor the robotic approach. Nearly half of the respondents (48.8%) believed RT provided better overall outcomes compared to the open approach. The most commonly expected advantage was improved cosmetic results (80.6%). Leading concerns regarding RT included the surgeon's experience and case volume (40.3%), increased cost (29.9%) and risk of conversion to open surgery (25.6%). Multivariable regression analyses identified that familiarity with RT (OR 2.01, p = 0.044) and the perception of RT's superiority over open surgery (OR 5.36, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with preference for RT. Expense concerns were independently associated with a lower likelihood of choosing RT (OR 0.26, p < 0.001). This study identified that participants' understanding of RT was limited in certain aspects, along with some unfounded expectations and concerns. These findings highlighted the need for clearer information, structured patient education, and evidence-based preoperative counseling to manage expectations, address misconceptions and support informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.