ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke patients using clinico-radiomics models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are AI Neuroimaging Models Ready for Clinical Use? A Systematic Methodological Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a clinico-radiomics model integrating radiomics features from multiparametric MRI and clinical scoring systems to predict hemorrhagic transformation (HT) in acute ischemic stroke. A total of 918 patients were retrospectively included. Patients from Institution A who underwent MRIs between 2017 and 2019 were assigned to the training set (n = 792), whereas those from 2020 (n = 78) formed the internal validation set. External validation included 48 patients from Institution B. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI, including diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and gradient-echo. Radiomics features were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and random forest models. Clinico-radiomics models were developed using logistic regression by combining radiomics features with clinical scoring systems (HAT, SEDAN, DRAGON, SITS-ICH). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with DeLong's test for comparison. Ten radiomics features were selected: time-to-peak, mean transit time, time-to-maximum, relative cerebral blood volume, and relative cerebral blood flow. The radiomics model demonstrated comparable performance to clinical models in the internal validation set (AUC: 0.79 vs. 0.75-0.81); but outperformed them in the external validation set (AUC: 0.85 vs. 0.66-0.68). Clinico-radiomics models demonstrated higher AUCs than radiomics or clinical models in both internal (AUC: 0.81-0.84 vs. 0.79 vs. 0.75-0.81) and external validation sets (AUC: 0.86-0.89 vs. 0.85 vs. 0.66-0.68). These findings suggest that clinico-radiomics models offer improved predictive accuracy for HT compared to radiomics or clinical scoring models alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.