ArticleOecologia2025
Host plant quality mediates dispersal, oviposition, and sex allocation in a Tetranychus spider mite.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dispersal is a key adaptive strategy to escape deteriorating environments, and habitat selection by dispersers is critical to their own and offspring fitness. Using the haplodiploid spider mite Tetranychus ludeni Zacher as a model species, we investigated how host plant quality influenced dispersal probability, habitat selection, and subsequent reproductive performances. We tested two dispersal scenarios: mated females had triple choice, i.e. residing in low-quality (LQ) or high-quality (HQ) habitat or dispersing to a LQ or HQ habitat. Results show that significantly more females dispersed from LQ habitats than from HQ habitats, and dispersers preferred to settle in HQ habitats regardless of the dispersal scenarios. However, aggregating in HQ habitats resulted in a higher number of eggs accumulated but increased immature mortality which induced restraint of the per capita fecundity. Females dispersed from LQ habitats produced significantly smaller eggs but maintained a similar proportion of daughters compared to those remaining in LQ habitats, whilst females dispersed from HQ habitats produced eggs of a similar size but a significantly higher proportion of daughters, suggesting that dispersing females might manipulate offspring sex ratio by lowering the fertilisation threshold to fertilise relatively smaller eggs. Increasing female density strongly restrained the per capita fecundity when dispersed from LQ to LQ habitats, but increased egg size and daughter production when residing in HQ habitats. Egg size had no significant effect on egg hatching or immature survival. This study delivers insights into the dispersal and reproductive strategies of a haplodiploid species, highlighting how host quality shapes adaptive responses in challenging environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41188456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.