Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188446›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning approaches for enhanced estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo): a comparative evaluation.

Abousrie A Farag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abousrie A FaragDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Banha, Egypt. abousrie.ahmad@fagr.bu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3758-2385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is critical for effective water resource management, particularly in regions with limited meteorological data. However, existing empirical and deep learning models often require extensive data or complex modeling, limiting their practical application in data-scarce environments. This study innovatively applies static (non-sequential) machine learning models K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF) justified by temporal dependency analysis, to estimate daily ETo using varying input scenarios, from full-feature datasets to minimal single-variable inputs. Results show that RF outperforms other models, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.52 mm/day and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.96, with temperature and solar radiation identified as key predictors. These findings highlight the practicality of RF for robust and efficient ETo estimation, offering a reliable tool for water management and agricultural planning in resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

Decision treeEvapotranspirationIrrigation managementK-Nearest neighborsMachine learningRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID41188446
PMCPMC12586539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.