ArticleScientific reports2025
Large-scale SARS-CoV-2 sequencing indicates prior community circulation of the viral strain associated with Germany's largest meat processing plant.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak at a meat processing plant (MPP) in the German district of Gütersloh accounted for 18% of Germany's SARS-CoV-2 cases in June 2020 and was subject of intense public interest, including the speculation that the outbreak strain may have been imported by foreign MPP workers. We sequenced the SARS-CoV-2 genomes of 1,438 SARS-CoV-2 samples collected from Gütersloh MPP workers for serial diagnostic testing and screening purposes ("outbreak samples"; approximate case coverage 68%) and of 157 samples collected from Gütersloh-area cases for routine diagnostic purposes ("community samples"). Greater than 98% of outbreak samples carried the outbreak-associated strain, defined by eight mutations and lineage B.1.329, confirming the overall clonality of the outbreak and showing that potential secondary introductions of other viral lineages had an at most limited role. Of fifteen viral sub-lineages detected in early outbreak-associated samples sequenced by another study, only one showed substantial persistence into the peak outbreak period, suggesting that transmission dynamics within the MPP were influenced by bottlenecks and superspreading-like patterns. While the detection of B.1.329 in community samples peaked during the outbreak, it was found to be present in community samples between March and September 2020, with the first exact matches to the outbreak strain appearing in April 2020. We found no epidemiological connections between early B.1.329-carrying community cases and the MPP, and a GISAID search for B.1.329 did not identify any samples collected outside of Germany. The outbreak strain was therefore likely circulating within the community before the outbreak and there was no indication of importation by MPP workers. Our study demonstrates how large-scale viral genome sequencing can contribute to the investigation of outbreaks and inform public discourse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.