Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188439›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring geospatial link between soils and national intelligence quotient.

Sabit Erşahin, Faruk Tohumcu, Rüştü Çallı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sabit ErşahinDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Agricultural Faculty, Iğdır University, 76000, Suveren, Iğdır, Türkiye. acapsu@gmail.com.
Faruk TohumcuDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Agricultural Faculty, Iğdır University, 76000, Suveren, Iğdır, Türkiye.
Rüştü ÇallıDepartment of Architecture and Urban Planning Iğdır Technical Sciences Vocational School, Iğdır University, 76000, Suveren, Iğdır, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently published maps have suggested a notable spatial association between soil fertility and the mean national intelligence quotient (MNIQ) across the globe. This raises intriguing questions about whether the nutritional impact of soil could influence human intellectual capacity on a worldwide scale. This study seeks to investigate these potential connections by examining the spatial relationships between soil fertility and MNIQ in 126 countries. A soil fertility index (SFI) was developed by integrating soil type and pH data, and its relationship with MNIQ was analyzed using regression and correlation techniques. Geostatistical methods were employed to explore the spatial relationships between MNIQ and SFI. The findings indicated a significant correlation (r = 0.58, P < 0.001) between SFI and MNIQ, accounting for 34% of the variability in MNIQ. Semivariograms for MNIQ, SFI, and their cross-semivariogram were modeled to assess their spatial interrelation. The isotropic semivariograms and cross-semivariogram showed considerable similarity in terms of nugget effect and geostatistical range, suggesting that similar spatial processes may govern the variability of soil fertility and human IQ globally. While these results offer valuable insights into the relationship between soil and human intelligence, it is crucial to recognize that this interplay is complex and influenced by various interconnected factors, including soil management practices, socioeconomic conditions, and cultural traditions. Therefore, collaborative efforts across multiple scientific disciplines and institutions are necessary to comprehensively understand the intricacies of this relationship.

Identifiers

PMID41188439
PMCPMC12586525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.