ArticleScientific reports2025
An intersectional approach to examine low birthweight by migration status in Sweden using register data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare differences in low birthweight (LBW, < 2500 g) between the offspring of Swedish-born women and migrant women from the Global North and Global South, while simultaneously considering the role of other social factors. We used total population registers to study resident women who gave birth in Sweden between 1997 and 2016, representing a total of 1,917,171 live births. Logistic regression analyses were performed using two analytical approaches: (1) a standard approach, applying regression models to assess the association between region of birth and LBW while adjusting for social factors; and (2) an intersectional approach, with an additive combination of region of birth, income, and parental support variables. Both approaches yielded odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and were adjusted for year of birth, maternal age, and parity. Results from both approaches showed differences in the odds of LBW according to maternal background. Importantly, findings from the intersectional approach demonstrated that women from the Global South had consistently higher odds of LBW across income levels, but with risks amplified among those living alone. These findings show that maternal migration background is a strong determinant of LBW, and that its impact is differentially compounded by social factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.