Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188394›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep multi-metrics learning for mobile app defect prediction using code and process metrics.

Ahmed Abdu, Hakim A Abdo, Inam Ullah, Jawad Khan, Yeong Hyeon Gu, Redhwan Algabri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed AbduSchool of Information, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an, 710100, China.
Hakim A AbdoDepartment of Computer Science, Hodeidah University, Al-Hudaydah, Yemen.
Inam UllahDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, 13120, Republic of Korea.
Jawad KhanSchool of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam, 13120, Republic of Korea.
Yeong Hyeon GuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of Software and Convergence Technology, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, Republic of Korea. yhgu@sejong.ac.kr.
Redhwan AlgabriDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, Republic of Korea. redhwan@sejong.ac.kr.

Funding

the ITRC(Information Technology Research Center) (IITP-2024-RS-2024-00437191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise in mobile apps necessitates precise defect prediction to aid developers in resource allocation. The efficacy of defect prediction relies on data representation and model selection. However, existing research relies on isolated data sources, limiting models' ability to capture the complex interplay of code and process metrics in app development. This paper addresses this limitation by proposing a Deep Multi-Metrics Learning Model (DMLM), which leverages code metrics from the current code version and process metrics from previous releases. A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) is employed to capture intricate patterns within these metrics, enabling more accurate predictions. Experimental evaluations using nine real-world Android apps from Git Android repositories demonstrate that DMLM outperforms state-of-the-art approaches under non-effort-aware conditions regarding Area Under the Curve (AUC), F1 scores, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The experimental evaluation also demonstrates that the DMLM model outperforms existing baseline methods in PofB20 under effort-aware conditions. The findings highlight the efficacy of DMLM in enhancing mobile app defect prediction performance across both non-effort-aware and effort-aware contexts.

Indexed as

Code metricsDeep neural networkMobile app defect predictionProcess metrics

Identifiers

PMID41188394
PMCPMC12586470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.