ArticleScientific reports2025
An interpretable crop leaf disease and pest identification model based on prototypical part network and contrastive learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The disease and pest recognition algorithms based on computer vision can automatically process and analyze a large amount of disease and pest images, thereby achieving rapid and accurate identification of disease and pest categories on crop leaves. Currently, most studies use deep learning models for feature extraction and identification of crop leaf disease and pest images. However, these methods are often seen as "black box" model, making it difficult to interpret the basis for their specific decisions. To address this issue, we propose an intrinsically interpretable crop leaf disease and pest identification model named Contrastive Prototypical Part Network (CPNet). The idea of CPNet is to find the key regions that influence the model's decision by calculating the similarity values between the convolutional feature maps and the learnable latent prototype feature representations. Moreover, because the limited availability of data resources for crop leaf disease and pest images, we employ a supervised contrastive learning strategy to capture the similar information between examples in one class and contrast them with examples in other classes. Finally, we evaluate our approach on four publicly available datasets, and the experimental results demonstrate that our proposed CPNet not only achieves improvements in performance over baseline methods across multiple datasets, but also provides interpretable evidence for crop leaf disease and pest identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.