ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning based personalized tourism recommendation for behavior analysis and route optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cultural heritage tourism faces growing challenges in providing personalized experiences while ensuring sustainable site management, necessitating advanced technological solutions. Existing recommendation systems often fail to capture the complex spatiotemporal dynamics and diverse preferences of tourists, limiting their effectiveness. To address this, we propose a novel deep learning framework featuring three domain-specific innovations: (1) Heritage-aware Graph Neural Networks (H-GNNs) that model cultural significance propagation and temporal visitation dynamics unique to heritage sites, (2) Cultural Spatiotemporal Transformers (C-STTs) with heritage-specific attention mechanisms that balance cultural value preservation with tourist preferences, and (3) Heritage-adaptive Transfer Reinforcement Learning (H-TRL) that incorporates cultural site constraints and preservation priorities into the reward structure. Experimental results demonstrate improvements, with the GNN module achieving a 14% increase in behavior prediction accuracy, the STT variant reducing route optimization time by 16%, and the TRL module enhancing recommendation relevance by 12% over time. This study highlights the potential of the proposed framework to enhance personalized tourism experiences while supporting the sustainable management of cultural heritage sites, offering a scalable and adaptable solution for the industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.