ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic and predictive significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for trastuzumab treatment efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been linked to HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) prognosis treated with trastuzumab in previous reports. Here, the prognostic and predictive utility of baseline NLR in relation to trastuzumab efficacy was further assessed, with extended follow-up of up to 120 months. Clinical data from 843 patients with HER2-positive BC treated between 2013 and 2018 were analyzed. To reduce potential bias, inverse probability of treatment weighting was utilized for balancing baseline features. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received trastuzumab and those who did not receive trastuzumab. Each group was subsequently stratified according to the median baseline NLR. Associations between NLR, clinicopathological features, and survival outcomes were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Over the 50-month median follow-up (range, 6-120 months), patients receiving trastuzumab and having low baseline NLR demonstrated significantly higher disease-free survival (DFS) relative to those with a high baseline NLR (5-year DFS rate: 93.02% vs. 81.53%, P < 0.001). In comparison, baseline NLR did not influence DFS among patients who did not receive trastuzumab. Multivariate analysis confirmed that baseline NLR was indpendently predictive of DFS in trastuzumab-treated HER2-positive BC patients (high vs. low, HR = 3.61, 95% CI = 2.02-6.47, P < 0.001). Low baseline NLR was strongly linked to longer DFS in patients with HER2-positive BC undergoing trastuzumab therapy, reinforcing findings from earlier reports. Routine measurement of baseline NLR may serve as a simple and cost-effective tool to help identify cases likely to benefit from trastuzumab treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.