ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel morphological indexes for quantitative evaluation of cerebral aneurysm irregularity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A cerebral aneurysm may present irregularities associated with rupture risks. However, conventional morphological parameters are limited in evaluating the aneurysm irregularity. Although the mass moment of inertia has been devised for the irregularity evaluation, its performance still needs to be improved. In this study, three novel morphological indexes (NMIs) were devised based on the mass moment of inertia (ANI, aneurysm-to-neck index; AVI, aneurysm-to-vessel index; AII, aneurysm irregularity index) to effectively describe aneurysm irregularities. 456 patients with cerebral aneurysms (367 unruptured and 89 ruptured) were enrolled and their NMIs and the conventional morphological parameters were calculated for comparison. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were trained with each parameter and then used to predict rupture risk. All NMIs were significantly higher in ruptured cases than in unruptured cases (p-values for [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] were < 0.001, <0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). The highest performance for rupture risk prediction (sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 92.0%; and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.951) was obtained when the NMIs were considered in the ANN model. In particular, the [Formula: see text] effectively described the aneurysm irregularities that could not be evaluated using conventional morphological parameters. The NMIs were effective in evaluating aneurysm irregularities, enabling timely prediction of an aneurysm rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.