ArticleScientific reports2025
Adaptive tuning of fractional order PID controllers for nonlinear processes using hybrid PSO DQN reinforcement learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PaEDNet: A Robust Denoising and Classification Framework for Vibration-Based Fault Diagnosis with Measurement Noise.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an innovative adaptive non-linear fractional-order PID (FOPID) tuning methodology for a flow meter controller in a desalination plant, integrating a hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Deep Q-Network (DQN)-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) strategy with a dynamic weighting mechanism to optimize control of non-linear systems with time delays and disturbances. By utilizing fractional-order parameters, the PSO-DQN-RL framework ensures global optimization and real-time adaptability under fluctuations in operational parameters. Results demonstrate superior performance over traditional methods and advanced techniques such as Genetic Algorithms (GA), Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC), Neural Network-based PID (NN-PID), and PSO, offering faster response times, reduced overshoot, and minimal steady-state error compared to the slower and less precise outcomes of FLC, the static limitations of PSO, the rigid parameter settings of GA, and the inconsistent performance of NN. The hybrid method's enhanced robustness and dynamic parameter evolution surpass the modest adaptability of PSO. Despite its computational complexity, the offline-online balance and real-time GUI enable scalable deployment, positioning this scientifically novel approach as a benchmark for FOPID tuning in various applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.