ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep bayesian neural networks for UWB phase error correction in positioning systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Angle-based positioning systems have emerged as critical technologies for precise indoor localization across robotics, healthcare, and industrial automation applications. Ultrawideband (UWB) phase-based angle measurements offers theoretical sub-degree accuracy, but practical implementations suffer from channel inconsistency errors that significantly degrade performance. A dual-layer Bayesian neural network fusion framework (DBNNFF) was presented that effectively addresses these systematic errors through an innovative combination of physical constraints and uncertainty-aware modeling. Experiments were conducted in a microwave anechoic chamber using a customized 5-channel UWB base station and single-channel tags. Data was collected across seven azimuth angles between ± 30°, with 30s cold-start cycles per angle. The DBNNFF framework reduced the angle errors by 94.7% to 0.1036° ± 0.0182°, outperforming many existing algorithms by 25-42.1%. The framework's dual-network architecture-combining channel correlation model and cold start state distribution estimator-with uncertainty-weighted Bayesian fusion provides well-calibrated confidence intervals and exceptional noise robustness. Experiments conducted in multi-path environments such as office and hallway demonstrated that the DBNNFF algorithm exhibited robust performance, with errors maintained within 0.17°.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.