ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction in patients with diabetes and sepsis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Healthcare Capabilities: A Systematic Review and Research Directions.F1000Research · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to identify and validate key predictive factors influencing 28-day survival rates in patients with diabetes and sepsis and to develop a predictive model based on these factors to assist clinical decision-making. In this retrospective cohort study, we examined data from 303 patients with diabetes and sepsis treated at the Emergency Department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, between June 2022 and November 2023. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was employed to identify key predictive factors from 52 characteristics. A logistic regression model was then developed to create a nomogram for predicting 28-day survival rates. Model performance was assessed using calibration curves, Harrell's C-index, bootstrap validation, decision curve analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Six major predictive factors were identified: age, consciousness level, acid-base balance (pH level), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, myoglobin concentration, and the need for mechanical ventilation. The nomogram exhibited excellent concordance with the calibration curve, achieving a C-index of 0.833 and demonstrating robust discriminative capability, as validated through bootstrapping. Decision curve analysis indicated that the model provided a greater net benefit within a patient survival probability threshold ranging from 20% to 80%. ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.833, highlighting the model's strong discriminatory power. The predictive model developed in this study for the 28-day survival rate of patients with diabetes and sepsis demonstrates high predictive accuracy and serves as an effective clinical decision-making tool for healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.