ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of cyclists yielding to pedestrians at an unsignalized zebra crossing in Germany using drone video.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research has examined vehicle-pedestrian and vehicle-cyclist interactions, but there have been few studies that examined cyclist-pedestrian interactions at intersections. This study addresses this gap by analyzing cyclist-pedestrian interactions at an unsignalized intersection in Germany using publicly available drone data. The study presents a framework and proof of concept for analyzing cyclist behavior proactively, without relying on crash data. The primary objectives are to identify the variables influencing cyclist yielding behavior and obstructed travel time (OTT) within a predefined zone at a zebra crossing and to classify cyclist behaviors. Using logistic and linear regression models, several key predictors were identified, including cyclist speed, trajectory changes, pedestrian time-to-conflict-point, and interaction proximity, which significantly impacted yielding behavior. Speed reduction and pedestrian presence on the zebra crossing were found to improve yielding rates. Additionally, clustering analysis revealed two optimal and distinct cyclist behavior groups: one cluster exhibiting less yielding behavior, while the other demonstrated greater compliance with traffic laws. This proactive approach provides a valuable alternative in environments where crash data acquisition is complicated by privacy regulations. It offers critical insights for traffic management strategies aimed at enhancing pedestrian safety at unsignalized intersections, making it applicable to broader contexts with similar data challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.