Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188318›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Myoblast paracrine factors induce catabolic remodelling in electrically stimulated myotubes.

Magda A Lesinski, Michael J Kamal, Gianni Parise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magda A LesinskiDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton On, Canada.
Michael J KamalDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton On, Canada.
Gianni PariseDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton On, Canada. pariseg@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2016-05633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle plasticity is strongly influenced by a multitude of cell populations within the muscle niche. Satellite cells, or resident muscle stem cells, play an essential role in skeletal muscle remodelling after injury where they differentiate into myoblasts and directly donate myonuclei to damaged fibres thereby promoting protein synthesis. Satellite cells have also been shown to act in a paracrine fashion to influence the infiltration of immune cells and other cell types into the skeletal muscle environment to advance regeneration. However, in many degenerative muscular conditions, satellite cell activity is impaired. Moreover, their paracrine mediated signalling directly to muscle fibres remains poorly understood, highlighting a promising therapeutic target for addressing satellite cell dysfunction. The purpose of this project was two-fold: (1) develop an in vitro model of myoblast (MBL) intercellular communication following myotube damage and (2) to determine if MBL proximity alone is adequate for improving tissue repair and reducing cellular stress during recovery. C

Indexed as

Muscle Fibers, SkeletalMyoblastsParacrine CommunicationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineElectric StimulationMiceMuscle, SkeletalSignal TransductionCatabolismElectrical-pulse stimulationExercise-induced muscle damageMyoblast signaling

Identifiers

PMID41188318
PMCPMC12586710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.