ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating portable qPCR and image recognition to combat illegal trade in sharks and rays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Illegal trade in sharks and rays continues to undermine global conservation efforts, with enforcement often hampered by the inability to identify products to the species level. Here, we present a portable, cost-effective High-Resolution melt (HRM) assay for rapid DNA-based identification of elasmobranch species in trade. Using a reference library of 669 vouchered tissue samples collected from field operations and international market surveys, we validated the assay's capacity to accurately differentiate at least 55 shark and ray species based on melt curve profiles, including 38 species listed under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Automated image classification enabled high-throughput identification with 99.2% accuracy. The assay yields results within two hours at a per-sample cost of $1.50, and is compatible with portable qPCR platforms, making it suitable for on-site applications. This approach represents a scalable molecular enforcement tool that can empower local authorities to monitor trade more effectively, support compliance with international regulations, and enhance global efforts to combat wildlife trafficking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.