Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

JUHCCR-v1: a database for hand-drawn electrical and electronics circuit component recognition.

Ayush Roy, Saptarshi Pani, Samir Malakar, Erik Cuevas, Marco Pérez-Cisneros, Ram Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ayush RoyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India.
Saptarshi PaniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India.
Samir MalakarDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 9019, Norway.
Erik CuevasDepartamento de Electrónica, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, C.P-44430, México. erik.cuevas@cucei.udg.mx.
Marco Pérez-CisnerosDepartamento de Electrónica, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, C.P-44430, México.
Ram SarkarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic electrical and electronics component/symbol recognition from hand-drawn circuits is a challenging research problem. However, the literature survey reveals that there has been no significant progress in this domain. One possible reason for this might be a lack of publicly available datasets. To this end, in this work, we have developed a dataset, called JUHCCR-v1, which comprises 20 different hand-drawn circuit components that are commonly found in electrical and electronic circuits. Additionally, we have prepared a synthetic dataset having different variations (like orientations, stroke lengths, and distortions) of collected circuit components that may occur while extracting the components from an entire hand-drawn circuit diagram. This augmented dataset with the original ones would help train the deep learning based circuit component recognition algorithms. In order to provide a base result on this dataset, we have designed a weighted ensemble-based hand-drawn circuit component recognition method applied to snapshots of the convolutional block attention module-aided DenseNet-121 architecture. This benchmarking method achieves an accuracy of 91.15% on test set images. All datasets prepared here, along with codes, are made publicly available for the research community at: https://github.com/AyushRoy2001/Circuit-Component-Analysis .

Identifiers

PMID41188314
PMCPMC12586450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.