ArticleScientific reports2025
Perceived restorativeness of urban green spaces in southern China during summer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Context dependent sensory integration modulates landscape preference in urban parks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Personality and spatial familiarity interact to shape affective responses in urban parks: a VR study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although urban green spaces have been proven to benefit human physical and mental health, the impact of people's perceptions of biodiversity on these health benefits remains to be studied. This study measured physiological and psychological differences among 44 participants to assess the biophilic recovery benefits of two park sample sites in Foshan City. The effects of spatial features on recovery were analyzed using the perceptual restorability scale and physiological measures, including heart rate variability and electrodermal activity. In addition, eye-tracking methodology was employed to explore the impact of environmental components on biophilic recovery. The following findings were observed in this study. (1) Results from both physiological and psychological studies confirmed that natural landscapes of virtual urban parks activate the parasympathetic nervous system. (2) In urban parks, the addition of auditory stimuli could yield better restorative effects than visual stimuli alone. (3) Among the four sound combinations, bird songs in summer green spaces had a more arousing effect than cicada sounds, while cicada sounds had a better effect on heart rate relaxation than bird songs. In contrast, traffic noise could diminish restorative potential. (4) Using eye-tracking technology, this study analyzed differences in environmental features. Natural landscapes, such as forests, attracted more attention from participants when they were exposed to natural bio-sounds, such as cicadas and birds. However, the introduction of noise sound made artificial landscapes, such as squares, more attention-grabbing. In conclusion, multisensory biodiversity perception based on the audiovisual senses has specific restorative effects on the physiological and psychological dimensions of people in urban green spaces in southern China during the summer. In the future, biophilic design combining virtual reality and environmental interactions with multisensory spatial characteristics will enhance the nature-restorative benefits of urban green spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.