ArticleScientific data2025
Chromosome-level genome assembly of Hippophae neurocarpa.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hippophae neurocarpa (H. neurocarpa) is a deciduous shrub from the Elaeagnaceae family, widely distributed in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. It possesses significant ecological and economic value, while also being rich in nutrients and offering various health benefits. In this study, we successfully assembled the chromosome-level genome of H. neurocarpa utilizing Illumina sequencing, Nanopore sequencing, and chromosome conformation capture techniques. The total genome size is 682.80 Mb, with an N50 length of 62.17 Mb. We successfully anchored 669.20 Mb to 12 chromosomes, achieving a mapping rate of 98.0%. Furthermore, using RepeatMasker, we annotated repetitive sequences, revealing that 56.27% of the genome consists of repetitive elements, with long terminal repeats (LTRs) accounting for 36.26% of the total genome. We also annotated gene structures using de novo, homology, and transcriptome assembly strategies, predicting 36844 protein-coding genes, of which 32952 genes had successful functional annotations. Lastly, we employed various strategies for quality evaluation, with a Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) completeness score reaching 97.6% and a Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) Retrotransposon Assembly Index (LAI) of 11.61, the mapping rate further indicating high assembly quality. This study provides valuable genomic data for future research on H. neurocarpa and the broader sea buckthorn genus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.