ArticleScientific reports2025
Downscaled ERA5 Land addresses agrometeorological data scarcity in North African basins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A reliable estimate of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) requires several meteorological inputs, which may be unavailable in regions with limited data availability. In this regard, this study aimed to address the following objectives: First, to evaluate the effectiveness of ERA5_Land (ERA5_L hereafter) weather forecasts in providing daily agrometeorological variables for the period 2003-2021 at 10 study sites distributed over both plain and mountainous areas in a North African basin. Second, to investigate whether downscaling the ERA5_L data (10 km) to station scale (250 m) using a quasi-physical based model, MicroMet, could improve the reliability of the meteorological variables. Third, to compare the performance of the original ERA5_L reanalysis data and the disaggregated ERA5_L data (MicroMet) as potential sources for accurate estimation of ET0 on a daily time scale. Finally, to assess the long-term spatiotemporal changes in ET0 across the Tensift basin over the period 1950-2021, and the influence of climate variables and topography on ET0 variability. The findings of the study revealed that the original ERA5_L estimates of air temperature (Tair) were the most accurate among the studied variables, followed by solar radiation (Rs), relative humidity (RH), and wind speed (u2). When considering the disaggregated daily ERA5_L data, Tair exhibited the highest performance, followed by RH, u2, and Rs. Tair and especially u2 demonstrated an improvement across the plain and mountainous sites. However, Rs was generally degraded after MicroMet. Then, a comparison was conducted between daily ET0 obtained considering both datasets and show similar correlations between ground and simulated data but with an overestimation of ET0 after MicroMet. Finally, the retrospective analysis of ET0 showed three main phases with a decrease of ET0 between 1950 and 1970, a nearly steady period during 1970-2000, and a significant increase from 2000 to 2021. This study provides a comprehensive insight on the potential and limitations of ERA5_L products in arid North African regarding irrigation and water management under climate variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.