Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188268›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Morphological classification of the plantaris muscle origin: a cadaveric study.

Hyemin Lee, Yijin Heo, Dasom Kim, Seung-Jun Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyemin LeeDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea.
Yijin HeoDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea.
Dasom KimDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Jun HwangDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea. sjhwang@amc.seoul.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plantaris muscle (PM), considered vestigial in humans, has clinical significance owing to its anatomical variations. This study examined the prevalence, origin types, and clinical relevance of the PM in the Korean population to aid clinical and surgical practices, particularly in posterior knee surgery. A total of 160 lower limbs (90 male, 70 female) were dissected using classical anatomical methods. The morphology of PM origin was classified, and its prevalence was evaluated. The PM was present in 146 lower limbs (91.25%). Three distinct origin types were observed: Type 1 (68.18%), originating from the knee joint capsule, the lateral condyle of the femur (LFC), and the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle (lhGM), with fibers blending into the lhGM tendon; Type 2 (17.53%), originating from the knee joint capsule and the LFC but not blending with the lhGM tendon; and Type 3 (5.19%), originating solely from the LFC and the knee joint capsule, without any attachment to or connection with the lhGM. The average PM muscle belly length and width were 9.56 ± 1.71 cm, and 1.80 ± 0.64 cm, respectively. The PM shows morphological variability according to its origin attachment types. These findings provide valuable baseline data for understanding the anatomy of the PM, which can assist surgeons in diagnosing and treating conditions associated with posterior knee pain.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCadaverFemaleFemurHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedTendonsAnatomical variationCadaverMorphometryPlantaris muscleRepublic of KoreaTennis leg

Identifiers

PMID41188268
PMCPMC12586595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.