ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model for differentiating glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphoma using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) to differentiate glioblastoma (GB) from primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), while comparing the performance of models using high-order versus low-order features. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 383 patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses (226 GB cases with 226 samples; 157 PCNSL cases with 232 samples). Radiomic features were extracted from CE-T1WI sequences using PyRadiomics, including both low-order and high-order features. A sequential feature selection pipeline combining variance thresholding, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to identify the most informative and stable radiomic features for model building. Ten machine learning algorithms, including LightGBM, logistic regression, and random forests, were utilized to construct classifiers. Model performance was evaluated based on area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV). A comparison of the average performance metrics across all ten models was conducted between the high-order and low-order feature models. Interpretability was provided through SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP). Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS version 25.0 and Python 3.10.16. The sum of 1316 high-order features were extracted, and after feature reduction and selection, 17 optimal features were retained for machine learning models. Additionally, 107 low-order features were reduced to 20 discriminative features. The models, particularly those based on high-order features, demonstrated exceptional diagnostic performance, with AUC values exceeding 0.95 in 9 out of 10 models in the test sets. Among the ten classifiers evaluated, the LGBM model emerged as the most robust performer, achieving a test set AUC of 0.955 and demonstrating the smallest discrepancy (0.001) between the training and test AUC values. High-order features significantly outperformed low-order features, with improvements in AUC, sensitivity, and NPV (p < 0.05). The SHAP provided an in-depth interpretation of the LGBM model's predictions, identifying key features such as original_firstorder_Kurtosis and exponential_GLDem_DependanceVariance as significant contributors, while offering both global and sample-specific perspectives. The study demonstrates the potential of using a CE-T1WI-derived radiomics approach combined with machine learning for distinguishing GB from PCNSL with high accuracy and interpretability. The model provides a practical, non-invasive diagnostic approach to support preoperative decision-making, particularly when biopsy or pathological sampling is challenging or uncertain. This approach has strong potential for clinical application in neuro-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.