Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188258›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model for differentiating glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphoma using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging.

Xueming Xia, Qiaoyue Tan, Yuxin Xie, Wenjun Wu, Qiheng Gou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xueming Xia *Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiaoyue Tan *Radiotherapy Physics and Technology Center, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuxin XieDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenjun WuDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. wuhan_wuwj@163.com.
Qiheng GouDivision of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. gouqiheng513@wchscu.cn.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province of China 2024NSFSC1188Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Program Project 2024YFHZ0051Sichuan University's Innovation Project from 0 to 1 2022SCUH0032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) to differentiate glioblastoma (GB) from primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), while comparing the performance of models using high-order versus low-order features. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 383 patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses (226 GB cases with 226 samples; 157 PCNSL cases with 232 samples). Radiomic features were extracted from CE-T1WI sequences using PyRadiomics, including both low-order and high-order features. A sequential feature selection pipeline combining variance thresholding, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to identify the most informative and stable radiomic features for model building. Ten machine learning algorithms, including LightGBM, logistic regression, and random forests, were utilized to construct classifiers. Model performance was evaluated based on area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV). A comparison of the average performance metrics across all ten models was conducted between the high-order and low-order feature models. Interpretability was provided through SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP). Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS version 25.0 and Python 3.10.16. The sum of 1316 high-order features were extracted, and after feature reduction and selection, 17 optimal features were retained for machine learning models. Additionally, 107 low-order features were reduced to 20 discriminative features. The models, particularly those based on high-order features, demonstrated exceptional diagnostic performance, with AUC values exceeding 0.95 in 9 out of 10 models in the test sets. Among the ten classifiers evaluated, the LGBM model emerged as the most robust performer, achieving a test set AUC of 0.955 and demonstrating the smallest discrepancy (0.001) between the training and test AUC values. High-order features significantly outperformed low-order features, with improvements in AUC, sensitivity, and NPV (p < 0.05). The SHAP provided an in-depth interpretation of the LGBM model's predictions, identifying key features such as original_firstorder_Kurtosis and exponential_GLDem_DependanceVariance as significant contributors, while offering both global and sample-specific perspectives. The study demonstrates the potential of using a CE-T1WI-derived radiomics approach combined with machine learning for distinguishing GB from PCNSL with high accuracy and interpretability. The model provides a practical, non-invasive diagnostic approach to support preoperative decision-making, particularly when biopsy or pathological sampling is challenging or uncertain. This approach has strong potential for clinical application in neuro-oncology.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsGlioblastomaLymphomaMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaCE-T1WIGlioblastomaHigh-order featuresLow-order featuresMachine learningPrimary central nervous system lymphomaRadiomicsSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID41188258
PMCPMC12586547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.