Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188205›Full record

ArticleInfant mental health journal2026

Development of a revised and abbreviated version of the postpartum bonding questionnaire (PBQ-R): First U.S. validation and association to child outcomes.

Andréane Lavallée, Jennifer M Warmingham, Mark A Reimers, Paul Curtin, Margaret H Kyle, Judy Austin, Seonjoo Lee, Tyson Barker, Maha Hussain, Elena Arduin and 8 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infant mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Andréane LavalléeCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-3084
Jennifer M WarminghamCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4215-5126
Mark A ReimersQuantitative Health Sciences and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9023-2785
Paul CurtinCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Margaret H KyleCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0771-827X
Judy AustinHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4348-8942
Seonjoo LeeMental Health Data Science, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3177-6357
Tyson BarkerInstitute for Child Success, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-7433
Maha HussainCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Elena ArduinCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Imaal AhmedCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ginger AtwoodCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sharon EttingerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University College of Arts and Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Grace SmotrichDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
J Blake TurnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Prudence W FisherDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-5183
Rachel MarshDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-6305
Dani DumitriuCenter for Early Relational Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-5192

Funding

Structural and Social Determinants of Maternal Mental Health, Morbidity, and Inequities in COMBOR01MH126531 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DUMITRIU, DANI, MARSH, RACHEL · 2021 to 2025
$4.7M
Emotional and biobehavioral mechanisms of parent-infant emotional synchronyK99HD115784 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LAVALLEE, ANDREANE · 2024 to 2025
$263k
CDC HHS 75D30120C08150CIHR 201910MFE-430349-268206Einhorn CollaborativeEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child and Human Development K99HD115784Fonds de Recherche du Quebec en SantéHRSA HHS T32HP10260NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD115784NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126531NIMH NIH HHS R01MH126531W.K. Kellogg Foundation P-6006251-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The postpartum bonding questionnaire (PBQ) is a maternal-reported 25-item measure of bonding, available in 15 languages, and widely used for clinical and research purposes in the United States (U.S.) and across the globe. Nonetheless, its putative 4-factor structure initially proposed in 2001 has never generalized or been replicated in other samples, nor has it been studied in U.S. populations. Using a U.S.-based sample of 610 English-speaking mothers who completed the PBQ 4 months postpartum-mean 32.51 ± 5.25 years old and 47.5% first-time mothers-the initial goal of this study was to confirm the 4-factor/25-item structure of the PBQ. Aligned with other published studies, our confirmatory factor analysis did not support the 4-factor/25-item structure. We then used exploratory factor analysis which supported the creation of a 1-factor/14-item abbreviated measure, the PBQ-R. Unlike previous versions of the PBQ, the PBQ-R is scored so that higher scores indicate stronger bonding. The validity of the PBQ-R was supported by its high internal consistency in this sample (w = 0.89), and correlations with maternal depression (ρ = -0.46) and child neurodevelopment (ρ = 0.11 to ρ = 22) and socio-emotional symptoms (ρ = -0.22 to ρ = -0.33). The new unidimensional shorter PBQ-R is suitable for use in the U.S. as a measure of general mother-infant bonding.

Indexed as

Mother-Child RelationsMothersObject AttachmentPostpartum PeriodAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansInfantPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultbondingfactor structuremeasurementmother–child relationships

Identifiers

PMID41188205
PMCPMC12747797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.