ArticleThe Journal of pathology2026
Contrastive virtual staining enhances deep learning-based PDAC subtyping from H&E-stained tissue cores.
Article in The Journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Molecular Biomarker Identification in Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- HER2 Score-Aware Virtual Immunohistochemistry via Non-Contrastive Multi-Task Translation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) subtyping typically relies on immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for critical markers like HNF1A and KRT81, a labor-intensive manual staining process that introduces variability. Virtual staining methods offer promising alternatives by generating synthetic IHC images from routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides. However, most current approaches evaluate success by image quality measures rather than assessing diagnostically relevant features. Here, we introduce a novel cycleGAN framework utilizing a contrastive-inspired approach trained on semipaired datasets derived from consecutive tissue sections. Our method significantly enhances PDAC subtyping accuracy based on synthetic IHC images generated from standard H&E inputs, improving the classification F1-score from 0.66 to 0.77 for KRT81 and from 0.61 to 0.73 for HNF1A, compared with classification directly on H&E images. This approach also substantially outperforms baseline CycleGAN models. These results underscore the clinical potential of contrastive virtual staining to streamline PDAC diagnostics and improve their robustness. © 2025 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.