Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188041›Full record

ArticleBJU international2026

Validation of the Testicular Health Outcomes Report (THOR): a testicular cancer health-related quality of life instrument.

Samuel A Gold, Amy L Tin, Viranda H Jayalath, Fady Baky, Nicole Liso, Brandon Williams, Rebecca Yu, Darren R Feldman, Samuel A Funt, Andrew J Vickers and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Samuel A GoldDepartment of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9850-3938
Amy L TinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Viranda H JayalathDepartment of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Fady BakyDepartment of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nicole LisoDepartment of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Brandon WilliamsDepartment of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca YuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Darren R FeldmanDepartment of Medicine (Genitourinary Oncology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Samuel A FuntDepartment of Medicine (Genitourinary Oncology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-6319
Andrew J VickersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1525-6503
Joel SheinfeldDepartment of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Richard S MatulewiczDepartment of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
UROLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTT32CA082088 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Brett Stewart Carver · 1999 to 2026
$7.1M
Optimizing Smoking Cessation Treatment for Patients with Bladder CancerK08CA259452 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Richard Steven Matulewicz · 2022 to 2026
$971k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA259452NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS T32 CA082088NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the Testicular Health Outcomes Report (THOR) tool by assessing associations of disease burden and treatment received with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains. MATERIALS AND

methodsTHOR, which comprises 26 questions across 14 HRQoL domains, was administered electronically to patients presenting for known or suspected testicular cancer prior to clinical visits and throughout their care longitudinally. We evaluated construct validity by determining whether related constructs showed better correlation with disease and treatment burden than unrelated constructs. Generalised estimating equations were used for each domain or predictor of interest.

resultsBetween August 2022 and November 2024, 709 patients completed 906 surveys. More aggressive post-orchiectomy treatment - such as retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), chemotherapy or post-chemotherapy RPLND - was associated with worse sexual function and problems with job/education. Patients undergoing nerve-sparing RPLND reported significantly better sexual function (22 points, 95% confidence interval 11, 33; P < 0.001) as compared to a non-nerve-sparing RPLND approach. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with lower fertility confidence vs surveillance or primary RPLND (P = 0.005). Psychosocial domain scores and concern about disease relapse improved with time (P < 0.001). However, concern about relapse was not associated with initial clinical stage.

conclusionsThe THOR survey instrument is a valid measure of symptom burden and treatment received in men with testicular cancer.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTesticular NeoplasmsAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultfertilityoutcomespatient‐reported outcomessurvivorshiptesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID41188041
PMCPMC13527647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.