ArticleMedical physics2025
Dynamic cone beam CT reconstruction via spatiotemporal Gaussian neural representation.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonstop gated cone-beam computed tomography for respiratory gating pancreatic cancer radiotherapy using dual-domain deep learning reconstruction.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) is critical for assessing tumor motion during a patient's breathing cycle prior to beam delivery. However, generating 4D-CBCT images with sufficient quality requires significantly more projection images than a standard 3D-CBCT scan, leading to extended scanning times and increased imaging dose to the patient. PURPOSE: To introduce a novel spatiotemporal Gaussian neural representation framework to reconstruct high-temporal dynamic CBCT images from 1-minute acquisition, preserving motion dynamics and fine spatial details without relying on prior images or motion models.
methodsOur framework employs a differentiable 4D Gaussian representation initialized from average CBCT images. Gaussian points are characterized by position, covariance, rotation, and density, offering a compact and dynamic model for CBCT scenes. A Gaussian deformation network, incorporating a HexPlane encoder and multi-head decoder, predicts Gaussian deformations to minimize L1 and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) losses between rendered and measured projections. Adaptive Gaussian control refines the representation by pruning underutilized Gaussians and densifying points in high-gradient regions. The method was benchmarked on the AAPM SPARE challenge datasets and further validated with clinical CBCT scans from a Varian TrueBeam system. For the AAPM SPARE challenge datasets, the performance of the proposed method was evaluated using the root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) and the structural similarity index (SSIM) in the four regions of interest: Body, Lung, PTV, and Bone. The geometric accuracy was evaluated by calculating the registration error when aligning the tumor to the ground truth using the Elastix package, focusing on pixels within the planning target volume (PTV). To demonstrate our method's capability in high-temporal motion dynamic modeling using extremely undersampled projections, the clinical half-fan projections from a 1-minute Varian TrueBeam acquisition were sorted into 50 phases with approximately 18 projections per phase, significantly finer than the commonly used 10-phase binning.
resultsCompared to the AAPM SPARE challenge participant methods, our method achieved superior geometric accuracy in terms of PTV alignment error, and comparable RMSE and SSIM when no prior 4DCT or motion model is used for our reconstruction. For PTV alignment, our method achieved translational and rotational errors of 0.54 mm (LR), 0.76 mm (SI), 1.36 mm (AP), 0.55° (rAP), and 0.93° (rSI), and 1.31° (rLR), respectively. For high temporal dynamic CBCT reconstruction, our method successfully reconstructed a 50-phase CBCT from a 1-minute Varian Truebeam half-fan scan, demonstrating effective streak artifact suppression, respiratory motion preservation, and fine detail restoration. Reconstruction on a single NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU required approximately 30-80 min, depending on the number of Gaussian points used (ranging from 50 to 400K), to reconstruct CBCT from 680 projections acquired with a 30 × 40 cm detector. Our code and reconstruction results can be found at: https://github.com/fuyabo/4DGS_for_4DCBCT/tree/main.
conclusionsThe spatiotemporal Gaussian framework is a novel data-driven dynamic CBCT reconstruction technique that features excellent geometric accuracy in terms of PTV alignment and high-temporal motion modeling, indicating promise for tumor motion assessment and high-temporal respiratory motion modeling based on a 1-minute half-fan scan prior to beam delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.