Trial reportExperimental physiology2026
The impact of healthy motion seating on lower-limb blood flow and blood pressure response to simulated long-haul air travel.
Trial report in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of healthy motion seating on lower-limb blood flow and blood pressure response to simulated long-haul air travel.Experimental physiology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prolonged sitting inherent to long-haul air travel can acutely decrease lower-limb blood flow and increase brachial blood pressure. Healthy motion seating (HMS), which passively alters sitting interface pressure and posture, is a promising technology which may attenuate the deleterious effects of long-haul air travel. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of an innovative airplane passenger seat motion feature, aerospace HMS, on lower-limb blood flow and blood pressure in response to 6.5 h of simulated long-haul air travel. In a randomised cross-over design, 19 healthy adults completed a 6.5 h long-haul flight simulation in aerospace seating equipped with (HMS) and without (CON) healthy motion technology. Superficial femoral artery blood flow, brachial blood pressure, and perceptions of mood disturbance, pain and discomfort were measured before and after flight simulation. In linear mixed models there was a significant interaction (condition × time) effect for superficial femoral artery blood flow, with a decrease in lower-limb blood flow in CON (-22.4 mL/min; 95% CI: -2.41, -42.39; P = 0.032) but not HMS (3.7 mL/min; 95% CI: -16.3, 23.67; P = 0.720) across the 6.5 h flight simulation. There were no interaction, group nor time effects for blood pressure. Mood, pain and discomfort all worsened across the 6.5 h flight simulation (time, all P < 0.05), but there were no interaction nor group effects. The passive alterations in sitting interface pressure, posture and movement created by aerospace HMS can prevent prolonged sitting-induced reductions in local lower-limb blood flow typical of long-haul air travel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.