ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Scatter-Free UV-Visible Spectroscopy for Accurate and Precise RNA Quantification in Complex RNA Nanoparticle Formulations.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colloidal Light Scattering Distorts Fluorometric Quantification of mRNA in Lipid Nanoparticles.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Measurement-Aware Computational Modeling for Optical Spectrometry in Scattering-Dominated Systems.ACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ribonucleic acid (RNA)-based drugs showed the potential for treating wide range of diseases. Their successful clinical use depends on developing complex nanoparticle (NP) formulations made from diverse biomaterials. Accurately quantifying total RNA concentration in complex formulations is challenging, often requiring expensive, low-throughput methods or fluorescence-based assays like RiboGreen that rely on effective NP disruption. This study evaluates scatter-free absorption spectroscopy (SFAS), a UV/Visible method that removes light scattering from NP components and enables accurate total RNA quantification in intact NPs. To validate SFAS, we employed diverse RNA formulations, including lipid NPs, polymer and dendrimer hybrid lipid NPs, and cyclodextrin nanocomplexes, which exhibit physicochemical characteristics that can interfere with RNA quantification. Data obtained with SFAS were compared to fluorescent-based assays utilizing RiboGreen and SYTO 9 dyes, which bind to RNA in free or encapsulated forms, respectively. SFAS demonstrated superior accuracy, precision, and reproducibility than fluorescence-based methods across all formulations, particularly those showing resistance to disruption. RNA quantification by SFAS was less influenced by NP composition and measurement conditions, unlike the RiboGreen and SYTO 9. These findings demonstrate SFAS as a versatile and reliable alternative to fluorescence-based assays for accurate quantification of total RNA concentration in complex RNA NP formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.