ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Super-recognizers sample visual information of superior computational value for facial recognition.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Super-recognizers sample visual information of superior computational value for facial recognition.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Super-recognizers-individuals with exceptionally high face recognition abilities-are a key exemplar of biological visual expertise. Recent eye-tracking evidence suggests that their expertise may be driven by exploratory viewing behaviour during learning, but it remains unclear whether this perceptual sampling is functional for face identity processing. Here, we develop a novel approach to quantify the computational value of face information samples and test the utility of information sampling in super-recognizers. Using measurements of eye gaze behaviour, we reconstructed the retinal information that participants acquired while learning new faces. We then evaluated the computational value of this information for face identity processing using nine deep neural networks (DNNs) optimized for this task. Identity matching accuracy improved across all DNNs when using visual information sampled by super-recognizers compared with typical viewers. Interestingly, this advantage could not be explained by the greater quantity of information alone, and so differences in both the quantity and quality of face information encoded on the retina contribute to individual differences in face processing ability. These findings support accounts of visual expertise that emphasize attentional mechanisms and the role of active visual exploration in learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.