Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187921›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Super-recognizers sample visual information of superior computational value for facial recognition.

James D Dunn, Victor Varela, Bojana Popovic, Stephanie Summersby, Sebastien Miellet, David White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James D DunnSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6964-909X
Victor VarelaSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.
Bojana PopovicSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-9659-6484
Stephanie SummersbySchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3268-450X
Sebastien MielletSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.
David WhiteSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-2699

Funding

Australian Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Super-recognizers-individuals with exceptionally high face recognition abilities-are a key exemplar of biological visual expertise. Recent eye-tracking evidence suggests that their expertise may be driven by exploratory viewing behaviour during learning, but it remains unclear whether this perceptual sampling is functional for face identity processing. Here, we develop a novel approach to quantify the computational value of face information samples and test the utility of information sampling in super-recognizers. Using measurements of eye gaze behaviour, we reconstructed the retinal information that participants acquired while learning new faces. We then evaluated the computational value of this information for face identity processing using nine deep neural networks (DNNs) optimized for this task. Identity matching accuracy improved across all DNNs when using visual information sampled by super-recognizers compared with typical viewers. Interestingly, this advantage could not be explained by the greater quantity of information alone, and so differences in both the quantity and quality of face information encoded on the retina contribute to individual differences in face processing ability. These findings support accounts of visual expertise that emphasize attentional mechanisms and the role of active visual exploration in learning.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionAdultFaceFemaleHumansLearningMaleNeural Networks, ComputerYoung Adultdeep neural networkseye movementsface recognitionindividual differences

Identifiers

PMID41187921
PMCPMC12585889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.