Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187916›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Evolutionary constraints shape the diversity of microinsects' wing morphology.

Jakub Białkowski, Jostein Gohli, Robert Rossa, Anna Ziemiakowicz, Jakub Goczał

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jakub BiałkowskiDepartment of Forest Ecosystem Protection, University of Agriculture in Krakow , Krakow 31-425, Poland.
Jostein GohliNorwegian Institute for Nature Research , Oslo NO-0855, Norway.
Robert RossaDepartment of Forest Ecosystem Protection, University of Agriculture in Krakow , Krakow 31-425, Poland.
Anna ZiemiakowiczDepartment of Forest Ecosystem Protection, University of Agriculture in Krakow , Krakow 31-425, Poland.
Jakub GoczałDepartment of Forest Ecosystem Protection, University of Agriculture in Krakow , Krakow 31-425, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-6686

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miniaturization profoundly alters animal morphology, particularly locomotory structures like insect wings. Larger insects possess membranous wings optimized for flight dominated by inertial forces, while microinsects have highly derived bristled wings with a reduced membrane, adapted to viscous interactions. Distantly related microinsects share striking similarities in some aspects of wing architecture, such as elongated bristles or narrowed wing blades, while features such as venation or proportion of bristled wing area vary widely. The basis of these differences remains unknown. Although insect wing morphology is largely shaped by evolutionary history, the role of evolutionary constraints in macro-to-micro wing transition has not been examined. For the first time, we combined morphological analyses with evolutionary modelling to explore how selection for wing optimization during miniaturization is constrained by evolutionary inertia in key wing features. Analysing 39 bark beetle species, ranging greatly in size, we found that some modifications, like bristle elongation or wing narrowing, exhibit very low evolutionary constraints, enabling rapid adaptation to miniaturization. In contrast, traits like venation development or bristled area proportion were highly constrained, requiring longer evolutionary timescales to adapt. Our findings provide novel insights into the origins of wing-architecture diversity in microinsects, emphasizing the role of evolutionary constraints in modulating the transition from macro- to micro wings.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionColeopteraWings, AnimalAnimalsFlight, Animaladaptationbristlebristled wingevolutionfeather-likeflightinsectminiaturizationphylogenetic constraintswing

Identifiers

PMID41187916
PMCPMC12585875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.