Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187907›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Drivers of diversity within and between microbial communities during stochastic assembly.

Loïc Marrec, Claudia Bank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Loïc MarrecInstitut für Ökologie und Evolution, Universität Bern , Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0941-6603
Claudia BankInstitut für Ökologie und Evolution, Universität Bern , Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4730-758X

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No two microbial communities share the same species richness and abundance profiles. Experiments have shown that the assembly of new microbial communities from the same environmental pool is sufficient to generate diversity within and between communities: when microbial dispersal is slower than division, communities exhibit low richness but high between-community dissimilarity; when dispersal is faster, richness increases while dissimilarity decreases. Here, we study a minimal stochastic model that recovers these empirically observed assembly regimes. Our mathematical framework yields explicit expressions for the abundance fluctuation distributions across low-, intermediate- and high-dispersal regimes, providing a quantitative lens on microbiome assembly. We derive analytical predictions for the bimodality coefficient that quantifies the transition between assembly regimes, which appears as a robust metric to predict community richness and dissimilarity. Additionally, we highlight the mean relative abundance as a complementary metric sensitive to differences in microbial traits (e.g. dispersal or division rates). Applying these metrics to experimental data indicates their practical value for the rapid identification of assembly regimes and trait asymmetries. Overall, our study provides general predictions about how stochasticity, timescales and microbial traits influence both within-community diversity (richness) and between-community diversity (dissimilarity) during the assembly of new microbial communities. Our work thus contributes to a better understanding of the factors driving variation in microbiome formation.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBiodiversityModels, BiologicalStochastic Processescommunity assemblydispersaldissimilaritydiversitymicrobial communitiesmicrobial ecologyrichness

Identifiers

PMID41187907
PMCPMC12585862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.