Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187809›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Characteristics of sediment sorting and sediment bound organic carbon loss during soil erosion under different soil organic carbon levels.

Ya Liu, Gang Liu, Ju Gu, Bo Sun, Qiong Zhang, Hongqiang Shi, Chengbo Shu, Zhen Guo, Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Abd Elbasit, Yunge Zhao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ya LiuState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Gang LiuState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China. Electronic address: gliu@foxmail.com.
Ju GuState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; Yangtze Ecology and Environment Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430000, China.
Bo SunState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Qiong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China.
Hongqiang ShiState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, Yichang 443002, China; College of Civil Engineering & Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China.
Chengbo ShuState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Zhen GuoSichuan Huabiaoce Testing Technology Co. Ltd., Chengdu 610097, China.
Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Abd ElbasitSchool of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sol Plaatje University, Kimberley 8301, South Africa.
Yunge ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China.
Xining ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSoil erosion-induced soil organic carbon (SOC) loss is a key driver of land degradation. SOC acts as both the target of loss and a key property influencing erosion processes. However, the mechanisms through which SOC content influences SOC loss during erosion, particularly its linkage to sediment sorting, remain unclear.

objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the effects of SOC content on sediment yield, sediment sorting characteristics, and sediment-bound organic carbon (SBOC) loss, and explore their interrelationships.

methodsSix soil with varying SOC contents were tested under simulated rainfall with varying rainfall intensities and slopes. Runoff samples were collected to analyze sediment yield, sediment effective particle size distribution, and SBOC loss.

resultsSOC reduced sediment yield by enhancing aggregate stability. Andstream power was the optimal predictor of sediment yield. The enrichment ratios (ER) of < 0.002 mm, 0.002-0.02 mm, and 0.02-0.05 mm particles in sediment decreased as a power function with increasing SOC content, whereas the ER of > 0.05 mm particles increased. Sediment sorting weakened with increasing SOC content, as evidenced by ER values approaching 1 across all particle sizes in soils with higher SOC. In addition, SOC exhibited dual effects on SBOC loss, namely increasing carbon sources to promote SBOC loss while simultaneously stabilizing soil structure to reduce SBOC loss. However, the carbon source effect was dominant in this study, leading to a logarithmic increase in SBOC loss rate with increasing SOC content. Further analyses revealed that SBOC concentration was mainly dominated by sediment sorting and soil properties, whereas SBOC loss rate was mainly driven by the coupling of flow hydraulics and sediment yield.

conclusionThese findings clarifies the mechanisms linking SOC content to SBOC loss and sediment sorting, providing a theoretical foundation for improving carbon-loss modeling and erosion control strategies.

Indexed as

Aggregate stabilityCarbon loss mechanismHydraulic parametersSimulated rainfallWater erosion

Identifiers

PMID41187809
PMCPMC13316406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.