Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187277›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Dementia Caregivers' Perspectives on Technology's Place in Care Practices: Mixed Methods Survey.

Julia A Scott, Emma Cepukenas, McKenzie Himes, Kennedy Anderson, Kiren Grewal, An Mai, Sheila Yuter, Patricia Simone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia A ScottDepartment of Bioengineering, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA, 95053, United States, 1 (408) 554-4000.ORCID 0000-0002-8361-5259
Emma CepukenasDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-5943-4684
McKenzie HimesDepartment of Biology, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1649-4964
Kennedy AndersonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-1584-8209
Kiren GrewalDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-2446-5713
An MaiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-8897-4400
Sheila YuterDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-7074-1044
Patricia SimoneDepartment of Psychology, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3364-1678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the number of individuals diagnosed with dementia continues to grow, collective caregiving capacity is simultaneously declining. As a result, caregivers often face significant stress and burnout, which negatively impacts both their well-being and the quality of care they are able to provide. To address these challenges, various forms of technology have been developed to support caregiving responsibilities for people with dementia. Barriers to widespread adoption include the cost of technology, lack of caregiver training, limited awareness of available solutions, privacy and ethical concerns, and resistance to change from both caregivers and care recipients. By identifying these key insights, this study seeks to inform the development of more accessible, user-friendly, and effective technological solutions that can better support caregivers in their vital roles. Objective: This study aimed to assess the way dementia caregivers solve common challenges, focusing on technology adoption and barriers to its use. Methods: We conducted online surveys regarding technology usage and caregiving experience, which were distributed to the communities of caregivers of people living with dementia. Surveys quantified categories of technology use and caregiver needs. The survey also gathered open responses for joys, struggles, and technology use. Follow-up interviews with caregivers discussed how specific challenges were met. The responses were thematically coded to characterize findings by the type-struggles, social supports, technology, and joy. Results: Respondents (N=69) identified access to resources as the most important unmet need for caregivers (53%). The survey found that medication and routine tracking applications and mobility assistive devices were the most commonly used forms of technology. The dominant need expressed by caregivers was for better access to resources, with improved access to health care services and financial support. Interviewees reported barriers to accessing resources, including high costs and difficulties in selecting appropriate technology resources. Additionally, centralizing resources and simplifying the process of locating support was recommended as a solution. Conclusions: The study showed that caregivers felt inadequately supported and did not frequently use technology due to barriers of access and usability of products. Strategies in product design and user communication that engage dementia care partners would likely accelerate adoption.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesaccessibilityAgeTechassistive technologycaregivingdementiatechnology

Identifiers

PMID41187277
PMCPMC12584996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.