Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187269›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2025

A Serious Game (Health Unit in Focus) for Enhancing Undergraduate Education on Older Adults' Health: Design and Validation Study.

Yuri Gustavo de Sousa Barbalho, Calliandra Maria de Souza Silva, Carla Sílvia Neves da Nora Fernandes, Raíza Rana de Souza Lima Trombini, Patrícia Littig Melo, Aline Farias de Oliveira, Alayne Larissa Martins Pereira, Alessandro de Oliveira Silva, Luciano Ramos de Lima, Marina Morato Stival and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuri Gustavo de Sousa Barbalho *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7251-5829 change to: 0000-0002-5584-998X
Calliandra Maria de Souza Silva *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9064-0735
Carla Sílvia Neves da Nora Fernandes *School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7251-5829
Raíza Rana de Souza Lima Trombini *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-9073
Patrícia Littig Melo *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-8628
Aline Farias de Oliveira *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7323-6407
Alayne Larissa Martins Pereira *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-9670
Alessandro de Oliveira Silva *Physical Education and Medicine Department, University Center of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3513-7034
Luciano Ramos de Lima *Nursing Department, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-6335
Marina Morato Stival *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6830-4914
Diana Lúcia Moura Pinho *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4212-2340
Silvana Schwerz Funghetto *Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasília, University Campus - Metropolitan Center, Ceilândia Sul, Brasília, Brazil, 55 61991127116.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9332-9029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Population aging underlines the critical need to improve health professional training to adequately care for adults aged >60 years. Developing educational resources to support academics and professionals presents a valuable opportunity to enhance understanding of health conditions and improve clinical management. Serious games are designed to develop teaching, training, and learning skills. Their use in the educational setting is warranted, as they integrate digital aspects and gamification to create a playful experience for content acquisition. Deepening this theme in nursing education will improve assistance to the older adult population, leading to more qualified care based on gerontological practices and comprehensive health care for older adults. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a serious game on older adult health for undergraduate nursing students. Methods: This quantitative and descriptive methodological study, conducted between February 2023 and December 2023 at a public university in the Federal District of Brazil, involved the active participation of 27 undergraduate nursing students in their eighth to tenth semesters. The game, Health Unit in Focus (HUF), was developed and validated with their input. It features 75 clinical cases distributed across 3 themes: pharmacology, metabolic syndrome, and semiology. Of the 40 students initially enrolled, 27 completed the study. The app was validated using the System Usability Scale and student feedback, and the results were reported following the Game-Based Intervention Reporting Guidelines (GAMING). Results: The participants had a mean age of 22.67 (SD 1.44) years, were mostly female (20/27, 74%), and were in their eighth semester (26/27, 96%). The game received an average System Usability Scale score of 85.75 (median 86.57), classified as excellent, as all evaluated items scored >75. Participants considered the game easy to use; accessible; practical; and rich in well-founded, useful content. This high usability score, coupled with the overwhelmingly positive feedback from the students, instills confidence in the game's effectiveness. Furthermore, 100% (27/27) of students agreed that learning through games is effective and expressed interest in incorporating more interactive games into their training. The serious game HUF showed good usability, as its overall score was "excellent," with its highest score in the odd-numbered items that addressed the positive aspects identified in the analysis. Conclusions: The serious game HUF is not just a valid and reliable tool for training nursing students but also an engaging and interactive approach to learning. Its ability to captivate and involve students in the learning process is a testament to its potential to revolutionize nursing education. It is essential that the development of new methodological resources, such as serious games, be based on scientific evidence to guarantee greater reliability and success in achieving their established objectives.

Indexed as

ageddesignnursing educationolder adultsserious gamesvalidation

Identifiers

PMID41187269
PMCPMC12584992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.