Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187210›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Machine learning augmented diagnostic testing to identify sources of variability in test performance.

Christopher Jon Banks, Aeron Sanchez, Vicki Stewart, Kate Bowen, Thomas Doherty, Oliver Tearne, Graham Smith, Rowland R Kao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher Jon BanksRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7650-1598
Aeron SanchezRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Vicki StewartUK Farmcare Ltd., Stone, United Kingdom.
Kate BowenUK Farmcare Ltd., Stone, United Kingdom.
Thomas DohertyDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Oliver TearneThe Animal and Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Graham SmithNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9897-6794
Rowland R KaoRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0919-6401

Funding

BBSRC BBS/E/D/20002174GB bovine TB research budget
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic tests that can detect pre-clinical or sub-clinical infection, are one of the most powerful tools in our armoury of weapons to control infectious diseases. Considerable effort has been paid to improving diagnostic testing for human, plant and animal diseases, including strategies for targeting the use of diagnostic tests towards individuals who are more likely to be infected. We use machine learning to assess the surrounding risk landscape under which a diagnostic test is applied to augment its interpretation. We develop this to predict the occurrence of bovine tuberculosis incidents in cattle herds, exploiting the availability of exceptionally detailed testing records. We show that, without compromising test specificity, test sensitivity can be improved so that the proportion of infected herds detected improves by over 5 percentage points, or 240 additional infected herds detected in one year beyond those detected by the skin test alone. We also use feature importance testing for assessing the weighting of risk factors. While many factors are associated with increased risk of incidents, of note are several factors that suggest that in some herds there is a higher risk of infection going undetected.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic Tests, RoutineMachine LearningTuberculosis, BovineAnimalsCattleComputational BiologyRisk FactorsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID41187210
PMCPMC12646444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.