ArticlePloS one2025
Factors contributing to differences in physical activity levels in (pre)frail older adults living in rural areas of China.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhysical Activity (PA) is essential for enhancing the physical function of pre-frail and frail older adults. However, among this group, PA-levels vary significantly. Identifying the factors contributing to these differences could support tailored PA interventions. This study aims to examine factors associated with physical activity levels among pre-frail and frail older adults in rural China.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study. A total of 284 (pre)frail older adults (aged ≥60 years) were included from ten rural healthcare centers in Northeast China. Participants were categorized into low-moderate and high physical activity groups assessed using the Short Form International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Four-dimensional data were collected, including demographics, health behaviors, objective physical performance measures, and self-reported perceived health profiles. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), a machine learning algorithm, was employed for binary classification (low-moderate vs. high physical activity). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. To enhance interpretability, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were utilized to identify key predictive variables.
resultsMean age of participants was 70 years (59% female, 86% farmers). The low-moderate group averaged 1,187 MET/week, while the high physical activity group reached 8,162 MET/week. Physical performance tests showed significantly better scores in the high PA group. The XGBoost model achieved 82.4% accuracy (AUC: 0.769, specificity: 90%, sensitivity: 63%). SHAP analysis revealed that self-reported social support, general health, ambulation, and physical performance measures were the most important factors.
conclusionThe high physical activity group demonstrated better physical function than the low-moderate physical activity group; though, both groups showed poorer physical function compared to the general older population. Self-reported health perceptions and social support significantly correlated with physical activity levels. Addressing these factors through targeted interventions-including community-based social support programs and structured mobility-enhancing exercises-may contribute to improved health outcomes and enhanced quality of life in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.